The National Association of Academic Technologists (NAAT) has raised significant concerns and expressed deep disappointment regarding its exclusion from the N630 billion intervention fund recently released by the Federal Government to universities and tertiary institutions. In a statement to journalists on Sunday in Abuja, Ideji Nwokoma, the President of NAAT, conveyed the union’s dissatisfaction.
While commending President Bola Tinubu for his commitment to improving the educational sector through infrastructural and human capital development, Nwokoma acknowledged the Federal Government’s effort in releasing the intervention funds. However, he drew attention to a critical issue – the Office of Accountant General of the Federation was directed to pay withheld salaries only to members of a sister union, excluding NAAT and two other university-based unions.
Describing this exclusion as not only unfair but also unjust, Nwokoma highlighted the potential consequences of such a decision. He stated, “We view this attempt as unfair and unjust as it pitches the membership of our union against the leadership and is creating a charged atmosphere, posing a serious threat to the smooth functioning of academic activities in our campuses.”
In an appeal to the minister, Nwokoma urged a reconsideration of the decision and emphasized the urgent need to address the plight of NAAT members. Specifically, he requested the immediate payment of over five-month withheld salaries, implementation of the approved 25 per cent and 35 per cent salary increase with arrears, and the release of earned allowances for NAAT members.
The union’s firm stance underscores the potential for a disruption in academic activities if the grievances are not promptly addressed. This situation not only raises questions about the transparency and fairness in the distribution of intervention funds but also emphasizes the importance of ensuring equal treatment for all university-based unions to maintain a harmonious academic environment. The current state of affairs puts a spotlight on the necessity for an equitable and inclusive approach to handling such funds to prevent the escalation of tensions within the academic community.
